File Under: Don't Confuse Me With Facts
In a vain attempt to convince self-professed reasonable people that they need not give up their Second Amendment protection of the right to bear arms many well-meaning firearms proponents will say something to the effect of: “More people die in automobile accidents each year in America that are ever killed by firearms, why don't you ban cars or limit the speed of cars to XXX mph?” To which clever and equally earnest firearm opponents quickly retort with: “Oh yeah, well automobiles are not designed to kill, guns were.” Certainly a snappy reply, but what is the reality of the situation? Let's find out using the dreaded .223 Winchester (5.56x45mm NATO) fired from a semi-automatic AR-15 rifle with a 20” barrel and a 30-round magazine AND my benign 1996 Ford Crown Victoria as test subjects.
In a vain attempt to convince self-professed reasonable people that they need not give up their Second Amendment protection of the right to bear arms many well-meaning firearms proponents will say something to the effect of: “More people die in automobile accidents each year in America that are ever killed by firearms, why don't you ban cars or limit the speed of cars to XXX mph?” To which clever and equally earnest firearm opponents quickly retort with: “Oh yeah, well automobiles are not designed to kill, guns were.” Certainly a snappy reply, but what is the reality of the situation? Let's find out using the dreaded .223 Winchester (5.56x45mm NATO) fired from a semi-automatic AR-15 rifle with a 20” barrel and a 30-round magazine AND my benign 1996 Ford Crown Victoria as test subjects.
How do bullets kill or damage the
target? By pushing (exerting blunt force) upon a small area which in
turn moves the mass being pushed; when the tensile strength of the
surrounding area is breached (it cannot stretch anymore) it tears and
the mass being pushed moves ahead of the path of the projectile
(bullet) creating a breach (bullet hole). A living target will die
if you either: A ) rupture an important organ (heart, lungs, brain
stem, major artery/vein) or B ) create significant bleeding from
enough bullet holes of sufficient diameter.
How do cars kill or cause damage? By exerting blunt force, crushing, expulsion, mechanical failure, or by combustion/explosion. For the sake of comparing apples to apples, we will simply focus on exerting blunt force.
How do cars kill or cause damage? By exerting blunt force, crushing, expulsion, mechanical failure, or by combustion/explosion. For the sake of comparing apples to apples, we will simply focus on exerting blunt force.
How much force does a bullet exert upon
a target on impact? Force is a calculation of Mass (grains of water)
x Velocity (feet per second) and is measure in Foot-Pounds. Nominal
performance of our test 62-gr bullet is an optimistic 3,000 ft/s at
point blank range. That means someone struck with this bullet will
receive 1,239 ft-lb of energy to their body, a little over half a ton
of energy.
What about the car? It weighs in at
nearly 2 tons and can reach a top speed of well over 100 mph. For the
sake of this discussion we will say it is moving at the residential
speed limit of 25 mph, thus giving it a whopping 83,573 ft-lbs of
energy. That’s roughly 42 tons of energy colliding into the human
body.
Killing Power: Point – Automobile
What about the idea that the existence
of firearms leads to deaths? Here the two are actually equal. If
you sit a box of rifle ammunition, next to an unloaded 30-round
magazine and an unloaded AR-15, the rifle will not load the magazine,
insert it into itself, and then commence to killing people
indiscriminately. Oddly enough, if you sit a can of gasoline and a
key next to my Crown Victoria it will not fill its tank, put its key
in the ignition, turn itself on, put itself in gear, and start mowing
down pedestrians. However, if I take that rifle, load it, point it
at someone and squeeze the trigger that person has a good chance of
being hit and dying. Likewise, if I get behind the wheel of my car,
point my wheels at a person, and depress the accelerator I could plow
into that person and kill them. It seems both require human
interaction to do any damage.
Autonomy: No points – Neither are
autonomous.
What about killing capacity, surely the
AR-15 can kill more people than the car in the same amount of time?
Each time the operator squeezes the trigger of the AR-15, one
projectile is realeased from the barrel of the firearm. After 30
rounds are expended the operator must reload. This process can
continue until the rifle malfunctions, the operator is defeated, or
he/she expends all rounds he/she has. What about the car? When
the driver depresses the accelerator the car will move forward until
it fails, the driver is stopped, or the vehicle runs out of fuel.
With a 20 gallon fuel tank and a estimated fuel economy of 20 mpg the
maximum distance the vehicle could travel without releasing the
accelerator would be 400 miles or about 16 hours of vehicular
homicide, give or take a few hours.
Killing Capacity: Point – Automobile
But guns are NOT safe, they kill
people, you could even accidentally shoot yourself. In actuality,
not likely. The mean time between failures (MTBF) or the likelihood
a firearm will misfire or otherwise fail to operate as intended in
rated in the tens of thousands of rounds (each time the trigger
activates the cycling of the action and the firearm discharges a
bullet). In practical terms this works out to virtually zero chance
in your life you will have an accidental discharge that you did not
create. In fact a firearm could be passed down for generations
without harming something due to mechanical malfunction. The most
popular firearms in distribution today have few or no external safety
mechanisms to interact with and yet accidental firearm-related deaths
remain low. Cars on the other hand have had safety issues from their
inception. We have improved the design of vehicles to include things
like: safety glass, restraints, air bags, anti-lock brakes, crumple
zones, and so forth. We have even enacted stricter automobile safety
legislation including: establishing licensing procedures, minimum
driving age, vehicle registration, speed limits, increased drinking
age, and tougher penalties for unsafe driving. We have even improved
the design and engineering of roadways to make them safer to
navigate. Yet, despite all these measures automobile accidents are
now the number one killer by injury in the United States.
Inherent Danger: Point – Automobile
But, but ...when someone gets hit with
one of those bullets ...why, they explode! Bullets are effective at what
they do, and the .223 Winchester it no exception, but they are no
death-ray – and they definitely do not explode. In fact, civilians
cannot get their hands on armor piercing or explosive ammunition.
Cars on the other hand can be quite devastating from the sheer force
of impact alone. Moreover, they are fueled by a highly combustible
liquid and can be rigged with explosives made from common household
materials to be mobile bombs, like the car used in the United States
most deadly school massacre, the Bath School Disaster, which killed
42 people. There really is not comparison.
Devastation: Point – Automobile
And here is the major rub. Car
ownership is not a natural right, nor is it a privilege expressly
protected by a Constitutional amendment. Yet, acquiring a vehicle
and operating it is vastly easier and less restricted than owning a
firearm, which is a natural right enshrined in the Constitution. No
background check, no waiting period, no feature restrictions, no
special tax stamps, no permit – you simply find someone with a
vehicle for sale and you purchase it. It is not even a criminal
offense to purchase a vehicle with the intent to transfer it to
someone else. The federal government even tried to make cars safer
by mandating they be built with arbitrary fail-safes to prevent them
from being unsafely operated, this however failed and went the way of
Prohibition.
Ease of Acquisition: Point –
Automobile
It seems when you look at the death
tolls of the two contestants and you add up the points, maybe the
automobile was designed to kill. Or maybe it does a far better job
of it than does a firearm in the hands of a conscientious citizen. Either way, it makes you wonder why the automobile is a status symbol, while the
AR-15 is a stigma?
"I Can't Drive 55" by Sammy Hagar from VOA released 1984 on Geffen
No comments:
Post a Comment